RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Price action"The fundamentals aren't important, but I want shares closer to fundamental value". Way to contradict yourself.
There are no fundamentals for this stock - it's a purely speculative play as I've pointed out several times. Point I'm making of $500M vs. $1B is that there's nothing to support either valuation. Of course you want cheaper shares, but what supports buying at either of those valuations? Literally nothing other than speculation.
There's no support at $2 and you can't justify it either because you got the number from a random number generator in excel.
I want this stock to blow up as much as anybody long term with 51k shares at an avg of $0.98, but if you want to talk about adding value to the board, people should come with some facts to back up their "price targets", otherwise it's a bunch of amateurs throwing around terms they read on reddit after investing for a couple of months.
Gilly123 wrote: The fundamentals arent so important for this stock. This is a spec play. Now that some of the euphoria has worn off MMed seems to be trickling down in price. There is no support from where we are now until $2. So without a catalyst it could easily fall to those levels. Potentially it could be a nice bounce target for a pump. Why would I still be interested in a 500million valuation over a billion? What a dumb question. I want cheaper shares closer to fundamental value.