RE:My prediction came true, this is a closeology play.btshooter, there is your bullsheet going again. Your prediction? Exploring on a property adjacent to another property with promise is "deceptive"? Get real. Your inference is that a property that is not located near another prospective property or mine is somehow better?! Contrary to your twisted logic, some of my very best wins in exploration have been with companies who focused exploration on trend with or adjoining other successes. I see this as no different. Your logic escapes me. Looks more like agenda or possibly a grudge you hold against the property vendor? Or maybe you want the option dropped so you can then secure the ground? KL finding gold just across the boundary?
I concur that it would have been nice to see stronger gold numbers in the first test holes but seeing gold at all is really what this testing seems to be about. It looks like they were looking for confirmation of gold being in the system at large in the target. That's how i am interpretting this. A mere 3 holes drilled so far, which is nothing, and you are writing everything off? If exploration properties were judged as live or die on the first 3 holes I imagine there wouldn't be many mines developed. That's an awful lot of prospective ground to write off on a mere 3 holes.
What is your agenda? You obviously have one. Fess up.