Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Great Bear Resources Ltd. GTBAF

Great Bear Resources Ltd. is a Vancouver-based gold exploration company focused on advancing its 100% owned Dixie project in Northwestern Ontario, Canada. A significant exploration drill program is currently underway to define the mineralization within a large-scale, high-grade disseminated gold discovery made in 2019, the LP Fault. Additional exploration drilling is also in progress to expand and infill nearby high-grade gold zones, as well as to test new regional targets.


OTCQX:GTBAF - Post by User

Comment by Goaweighon Apr 11, 2021 1:52am
337 Views
Post# 32973774

RE:RE:RE:GBRR v. GBR Relative Performance

RE:RE:RE:GBRR v. GBR Relative PerformanceIsn't all the data being put out in the public domain the only thing required to understand it is the appropriate software.
Mackie and other analysts seem to believe they have a pretty good handle on the resourse model and they update their # 's as more data becomes available.
I think GBR are doing this for very obvious reasons, at some point we are going to hit a tonnange and grade # that triggers a whole bunch of alarms all at once and the majors will be compelled to react or miss a once in a decade opportunity. 
Being as transparent as possible drives the price higher whereas a NDA doesn't really serve anyone's interest, does it ?




eatmorefiber2 wrote: Chris has mentioned they have had multiple conversations with interested buyers.  NDAs are generally signed before any data is exchanged.  Customary in M&A.  Once you sign an NDA, your control room better restrict the security from being acquired in the secondary.  At least that is in the US market.  


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>