RE:StinkyFish working for a major or just a crooked brokerI have said repbeatedly the RECO-ROE $100,000 to $18.6 million lay up for Mr Steinke is completely legall and that it stinks, but it is absolutely legal. The lay up speaks of how the RECO board is a rubber stamp for the original founder of RECO, yet who is no longer on the board or part of its management. The RECO board screwed RECO shareholders by selling lands for $100,000 in June 2020 and now is buying those same lands back for $155 million in new RECO shares, diluting RECO shareholders by 15% in new shares issued. You pay for that dilution. Says what kind of a board it is -- hardly one that protects is shareholders interests which is why there are Boards of Directors. The RECO board is protecting Mr Steinke's interest while concurrently not defending its shareholder? Answer: MIA. . In an ESG world RECO's board is not a ZERO it has negtive value.. It would be a farce were it not for the damage done by the directors to shareholders interests. I expect some Board resignations if the merger is not cancelled.