RE:Podcast interview with Peter EvansI thought that Podcast was done long. Anyway, Peter mentions that traditional metal detection systems- installed in order to determine threats (like that of a weapon in a backpack at a school) are very labour based, cost ineffective, don't scale, and are highly inefficient.
Unfortunately, there is no evidence that the PATSCAN system can address these issues. For example, that school in Ohio had a system installed about six months ago. From the pictures taken of the system at that school, it does not look like any of the issues Peter mentions in the Podcast have been addressed. Maybe they should show a live video of how that system was tested. Can we assume that six months after installation, that system is in operation at that school? For example, what was did the school pay? what was the labour saving?