developbc wrote: OEM vs Aerospace Powder Qualification
Congratulations Peter and Team with the major accomplishment in beginning to produce commercial powders!
Can you provide some insight into the qualification requirements for the OEM clients? Mainly is the process as robust has aerospace companies?
If the OEM clients qualifications easier I would think there is a good possibility they might want to lock up a significant amount of this production before the Aerospace qualification can be completed?
Thank you for everything you do for us retail investors!
Dear Newfie36,
The majority of the clients we are pursuing cater to the aerospace, biomedical, or automotive industry. The qualification process for each of these sectors is comprehensive. The typical end use of a titanium part is for a critical application, therefore the powder and end-part need to meet the most stringent testing/qualification criteria. We have developed our powder production with this in mind.
Sincerely,
Rodayna on behalf of Peter
NexGen's capabilities?
Congratulations Peter and the entire team at Pyro - this is not just a feather in Pyro's cap, it's an entire headdress made up of beautiful feathers :-).
Besides the huge incremental qualitative and quantitive advances announced today, I found this very interesting...."Management also believes that the NexGen™ powder production line will also enable PyroGenesis to uniquely process materials which, until today, did not seem economically feasible,"
Is it possible to tell us what these other "materials" might be? They can't be Silica/Sillicon or Aluminium dross because those are from the QRR or PureVap line of systems.
Many thanks.
A-G
Dear A-G,
Currently, any raw material that could be sourced in a wire format could be considered as a material we may offer as a powder. Aluminum alloys, Nickel alloys, and other materials which can be found in a wire format could be considered.
Sincerely,
Rodayna on behalf of Peter