Fansunite Entertainment Inc FUNFF

RE:RE:RE:RE:Sports-betting firm FansUnite doesn't want your bets

[Doozer]

I don't think Parker could have been more clear, he just, "posted the title and contents" of the article as a courtesy for all to read in the event some had missed it.  The title of the YAHOO article is "Canadian sports-betting firm FansUnite doesn't want your bets". Did you even read it? 

If you weren't so fixated on the headline, which again, Parker is NOT the author of, you would realize that Fans' preference is to be a B2B supplier for leading/significant operator(s) within the Canadian landscape as this would be great reoccuring revenue for such probable high volume operators.  This is consistent with their approach to the US, where they have no interest in the highly competitive B2C landscape and just want to function on a B2B basis.  Trying to pursue B2C in one jurisdiction can also impair B2B potential in that same jurisfiction as operators see you as a competitor and won't want to give you their business as a result.  Niche areas like Scotland make good B2C sense. 

As Scott was quoted in the article, "you've got some very big brands that have extremely big budgets, and spend a lot on consumer acquisition.  They're willing to go quite some time losing money on their users just to get the biggest piece of the pie...that doesn't necessary play well for a Canadian small cap like ourselves."

Fansunite won't shut the door on B2C per the article, and would certainly pursue this in the event that, "if it doesn't look like we're going to be a technology provider to anyone significant in Canada, then we'll probably look to enter directly ourselves."

Maybe if you knew anything about FANS B2C/BTB strategy on a jurisfictional basis, and actually read this article, you may be the one can learn a thing or two about this company.