RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Split upYes, you nailed it, at 51 yrs old that's my plan...
Tommy123 wrote: You just sound like an angsty, rebellious teenager trying to provoke a reaction from your parents lol.
Shirtlessnomore wrote: Hahahaha you are 100% brainwashed numbnuts!
Tommy123 wrote: The thing is, sure Trudeau is not a likeable person. But his policies are so great that people are willing to overlook that, and still vote Liberal.
Shirtlessnomore wrote: And turdo isnt a laughing stock?? How many times can 1 guy get caught in a scandal either stealing or lying? Is 7 or 8 acceptable to you? How about the fact that he is in bed with China? Is that ok with you and good for this country? It seems by your posts that you certainly support communism so I guess it is acceptable to you.
Tommy123 wrote: Honestly, yes, I support Trudeau. He will win this election. O'Toole REALLY messed up with his gun policy, and the Liberals are going to hammer them on it during the debate. Plus, the media is making O'Toole into a laughing stock by flip flippity flopping away!
Shirtlessnomore wrote: Go troll elsewhere Tommy, it's very clear to see your agenda bashing stock you want to buy and pumping what you own, your a true trudope supporter, lie and make up whatever suits you.
Tommy123 wrote: Maybe this will happen...though I think even hitting $20 a share in value will be very difficult if not impossible, over the next few years. I still see more downside than upside in the stock.
materialsgirl wrote: gashole
The basic theme of what you think is similar to what I expect.
The number of shares for each division will be different for the reason you
pointed out.
Conceptually you might get
0.5 shares for Division A
0.4 shares for Division B
0.3 shares for Division C
0.25 shares for Division D (Industrial for example)
The specifics would be based on the expected market cap of
each division and then to target a sahre price for each in
the $12 to $20 range.
The new values in total might be equivalent to $22 to $24
for the current shares.
A split-up might be done in conjunction with a merger plan idea
with another similar outfit in order to get better economies of scale.
This approach would avoid the pitfall of having $2 or $3 share prices
I did not do a detailed evaluation; just an illustration.
mat