RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Unloaded this at .75 and .74 this morning. Palfryville ... the point on marginal increase in shares isn't my point of contention. I don't know what you're in the market for but I've always strived to see the highest price appreciation possible for any stock I purchase.
So ... trading at $1.25 to do a placement at $1.10 for instance is a f'ck of a lot better than the marginality argument in share count to do it at $0.70.
Now you may rationalize things as a "cuteness" factor ... nothing wrong with it ... but I would point to the CRUX dude making that exact argument to Clark in one of those interviews.
So ... was it cuteness ... or was it a case of bending the knee for the CRUX dude and those families he represents?
Like I said ... the cheap paper swapped out and/or averaged up and are still well in the money at this level.
It's all in the numbers ... the support they gave ... and management capitulating ... provides a good risk/reward curve to them and they don't need $5.00 for a payout and the "no warant" ain't no big thang in their calculation.
Now if Kevin or Tommie would just step up and get to tweeting and updating some more then maybe the next level could be achieved.
I'm more than happy to trade off of their efforts while they juice things up.