Lobo Tiggre comments about EMO & fake doc I heard from an EMO.V shareholder that I made some mistakes in my coverage of the company. I did get the names of two historic deposits backwards, and have corrected that mistake. The other main issues were:
1] Outdated information on the company’s website, which is on them, not me.
2] My interpretation of the deposits as being primarily zinc, which is what the data given shows, at least by contained metal. That several other metals combined may have as much value as the zinc doesn’t make it any less primarily zinc.
3] The shareholder misunderstood what I wrote about a drill hole, which I did not say was low-grade. I wrote that it had been reported at "somewhat lower grades” before, which is true.
I’m happy to correct any errors I make. In this case, my error as minor, and did not affect my overall take on the company. (Future progress on the ground might do that—we’ll see.)
I understand that those with an existing financial stake would rather see nothing but glowing reports, but I think I serve all investors better by offering my best, unbiased judgment—for better or for worse.
I’ve invited EMO’s CEO to do an interviews. We’ll see if he’s willing to sign the media release I require.
(Lobo gave me permission to post)