Affinor Growers Inc C.AFI

Alternate Symbol(s): RSSFF

Industrials

Affinor Growers Inc. is a Canada-based vertical farming technology and greenhouse operations company. The Company is a patented technology developer and supplier of turnkey vertical farming facilities, including proprietary greenhouse, growing towers, automation and cultivation processes. It is focused on developing vertical farming technologies and using those technologies to grow fruits and vegetables in a sustainable manner. The Company has vertically integrated growing systems that can offer automated mechanical pollination for fruiting crops and vertical solutions for the vertical farming industry. It has an expansion plan to grow strawberries, romaine lettuce, kale and spinach across Western Canada. It is growing strawberries at four levels in a 15,000 square foot leased greenhouse in Abbotsford, British Columbia. It has developed and patented its own growing towers in Canada, the United States, Colombia and Aruba.

CSE:AFI - Post by User

Affinor Growers Inc > Ask yourself

<< Previous

Bullboard Posts

Next >>

Comment by HaulJockeyon Oct 10, 2021 3:17pm

121 Views

Post# 33993686

RE:RE:RE:RE:Ask yourself

First and foremost is the CEO's involvement with ATT, BE among others, and the Bridgemark group. If you don't know what that is about I can't help you, don't bother reading further.

Secondly, there is nothing propriatory about indoor growing. There's lots of it going on but it's super expensive and problematic. Net return on cannabis is high, so while indoor growing bites into the bottom line, (not a greenhouse) there's still enough margin to make a profit provided all goes well. Power outages, bugs and mold to name just a few.

Produce grown indoors (not a greenhouse) leaves very little on the bone for profit. Net return on lettuce is small. Growing lettuce is way easier than fruit or veg as well. Lettuce is mostly water and grows much faster than fruit or veg.

I'm not saying you can't do it, it's just not practical when you weigh the expenses involved. Now throw in moving parts spinning around on tiers of say 5 high, once the plants get bushy on top, they will block most of the light below. I say prove me wrong with confirmed photo's and video of start to finish plants on one of these contraptions along with maintenance records of same. I've been following for some time and have never seen it. Regardless, even if these spinning contraptions were used in a greenhouse setting, the smaller growth of the lower plants would offset any square footage savings, of which I believe to be minimal.

Lastly, the electrical setup that was so proudly displayed as being finished, was in fact not finished, had no meter installed and while it may have been to code, was amateurish compared to the scale in which we are to believe this company is.

I could probably nitpick a bit more but all these things I've pointed out are what most investors can clearly see with open eyes. I believe insiders that have a closer relationship with this CEO and the company could cast a brighter light on this than I ever could. What I have seen for myself is enough for me.

If you've made it here, you or someone you know got scr@wed by The Bridgemark Group.