RE:RE:RE:Update: Newlox Gold Admits to Toxic Cyanide UseCredibility goes a long way. I imagine most people would view passing off your own work as being actually published somewhere by someone else as under-handed and reason enough not to listen to what you have to say.
How about you post the source of this supposed article? Is there any reason why you can't?
I guess that Merrill-Crowe Achilles heel of yours isn't dead afterall. Care to clarify what you think the Merrill-Crowe Process is one last time?
Spoiler Alert: Merrill-Crowe requires gold-cyanide as it's feedstock for the process to occur and therefore requires cyanide leaching as part of the process flow of a plant that uses it.
By the way, I've never once claimed there were no processes that didn't use cyanide-leaching when recovering gold, only that you were completely wrong about the stated process Newlox uses: the Merrill-Crowe Process.
Go ahead. I'll ask again for you to provide a source, any source, that states otherwise. Why can't you find even one article, or reference, or video, or paper that proves just how wrong I am?
The most recent news release states that the Boston Project is fully permitted including the use of all chemicals utilized in the recovery process. That's an inclusive statement by the way; it includes things like flocculants, floatation reagents, and yes cyanide for cyanidation because they are all part of the process that is fully, FULLY, permitted.
Prove that that is not the case. Show me and the world whatever evidence you have to the contrary that they do not have a permit to use cyanide as part of their remediation and recovery process. But of course you won't, because you have none.
Prove me wrong. I've given you several chances now to try. Not once have you provided even a lick of evidence.
Somebody here is playing themselves off as something they aren't and it isn't me. See my complete lack of fake 'published' articles to your one for who's really pretending to be something they are not.