Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Newcastle Minerals Ltd A.NCM


Primary Symbol: V.NCM



TSXV:NCM - Post by User

Comment by tschauseppon Nov 13, 2021 5:44pm
232 Views
Post# 34123796

RE:Ownership top 20, incl. Changes... source Morningstar

RE:Ownership top 20, incl. Changes... source MorningstarI'm sure it's all legal. According to Canadian law, private ownership under 25% must not be declared. I couldn't find anything about corporation limits. Is the declaration law the reason Newcrest kept its ownership just under 5%?

Newcrest kept their PVG ownership as a secret as well. 
The Newcrest FY 2020 report, released August 14, 2020 shows under cashflow: payment for investment in Lundin Gold ($10 in 2019 and $79 in 2020), payment for investment in SolGold ($18 in 2019) and payments for other investments ($66 in 2019 and $3 in 2020).

The $66 payment equals exactly the Newcrest ownership of 4.8% in PVG. Other, smaller investments were declared by Newcrest; why did Newcrest keep the PVG investment as a secret? What information (withheld from other shareholders) did Newcrest have access to?  
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>