RE:RE:Accuracy of a bulk sample - is actually the pointIts like getting stopped for doing 150 km/hr in a 30 km/hr zone and telling the officer, "But I was only driving for 10 minutes." When all your assays are between 0.1 g/t and 1.0 g/t and suddenly you get one thats 100 g/t it should be obvious to most people that the problem is the assay or a nugget and you either re-assay the sample (which they did NOT) or you chuck it. You don't include 3 samples over 60 g/t with 146 samples averaging around 0.5 g/t ... FOR THE OBVIOUS REASONS.
And that folks is why Gamble will NOT give you the grade number he came up with when he went with the 146 assay numbers leaving out the three obvious nugget effect numbers.
If you were a mining executive with a reputable exploration company and you reported that ... you'd be fired.