RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Accuracy of a bulk sample - is actually the pointGotta admit I agree the fire risk excuse was pretty funny considering all the other stuff they were quite willing to do. Here's food for thought, maybe he just didn't want to come out and disclose the waste pile was clearly NOT economically viable. Its obvious some investors still believe there was a chance to make coin on processing the tailings there, despite all the pathetic numbers and the poor (and undiclosed) recovery rates. If he admits this to one single outside person and that person (i.e. you) kindly informs others, i.e. Stockhouse / CEO.ca then the cat is outta the bag.
p.s. fire season has been over for quite a while
Do you run a bookstore by any chance?