RE:RE:RE:RE:Near as I can findYup...multiple high grade samples....from the 109 drilling and the 149 trenching samples
From both trenching and drilling, 258 samples
Yup...multiple high grade samples as you are very much aware
From this man-made stockpile...proving that the stockpile contains gold, and not just gold, but significant mutlitiple high assays, raise the probability that there is more
Do you remember your high school algebra? the difference between 'chance' and 'probability'...
Ya...didn't think so....you might want to look into it
you always like to come back to drilling eh? why? because you want to ignore the 149 samples from trenching as they also showed gold .. And significant values as well
Yup...258 samples...with multiple high grades - within this man-made stockpile
Sorry, but you lost this argument a long time ago already......
there is gold in the stockpile, and based on multiple high grade hits - from both trenching and drilling, in only 8200 sq feet of surface area, there is high 'probability' that the assays are accurate, because the 'chance' of hitting multiple high grades in random drilling and trenching is very low.
As for your "one foot to the side" question - that is the most absurb question imaginable...which coming from you is not really surprising.
258 samples averaging 3.394 g/t
Sorry kozmo...PHD found gold
Sorry you don't like it
KozmoT wrote: I'm not the one making the wild assumptions Gamble - that's you when you assume an obvious nugget effect in 3 of 109 1 to 3 kg samples samples can be included to reflect the grade of the 27,000 tonne waste pile as a whole.
Tell us what the grade of the pile would be if that one single 300+ g/t hole had been drilled just 1 foot to the side? You can't or won't, which tells me you are deliberately trying to mislead people about the overall grade of the waste.