RE:RE:Regarding my last most reply, a continuationYes, yes Antlercarver.
What I was more so driving at was the Paradigm Capital research analyst note made no specific mention of the most advantageous USEPA associated and clearly supported circumstance which has been developed in order to unambiguously support the now requisite purchase of NanoXplore's "Graphene BlackTM" product by or on behalf of all American and foreign based developers and manufacturers of graphene comprised parts and components being supplied to every automotive manufacturer producing vehicles within the U.S.
I am relatively certain that the entire research report from Paradigm Capital will be containing much more granularity with respect to the various greatly positive issues being brought forward and discussed by myself and others. These are developments which are exclusively beneficial for NanoXplore.
By the way, I expect that Ford Motor Company's graphene comprised parts and components procurement issue has been amicably settled and that we will be finding out precisely how such a settlement is to exclusively benefit NanoXplore.
Ford Motor Company was the first domino to be pushed forward; thus initiating the downward falling cascade of developers and manufacturers supplying graphene comprised parts and components to all the other automotive manufacturers operating within the U.S.
It's going to be our "Graphene BlackTM" product which must be included in all those automotive manufacturer suppliers provisioned parts and components.
'Advanced 'structural' battery cell modules encasements' and associated lightweighting enabling components, amongst many many other developed and adopted uses of "Graphene BlackTM", will ensure that NanoXplore will increasingly become and remain increasingly quite profitable going forward.
It's "Graphene BalckTM" or bust for those affected manufacturers and suppliers.