RE:RE:RE:OMGWTFLOLThank you once again for your civil response, Ivorygull. I'll respond to you again publicly since you have done so as well.
You and I are on the same page from the sounds of it, we just don't agree about my tactics, which are to challenge the trolls publicly at every turn.
I really don't think there's any value for me to try doing this via private message with troIls. That said, I understand your concerns.
Other than perhaps dealing with the harassment caused by our trolls, I'm not sure that Stockhouse with their acceptable use policy is equiped or willing to deal with our type of trolls.
I honestly thought that folks had already tried to appeal to Stockhouse to do something when I started posting and that nothing had come of it. If that's not the case, then it is definitively worth a shot.
If you or anyone else are willing to help, I would certainly appreciate it.
I am not an expert market enforcement investigator by any means and I unfortunately haven't read the trolls' hundreds of posts (nor do I intend to do so.) I'm going to work with what I've seen from the trolls since I stated posting. There's plenty there to start with.
Other than #15 "intimidate or harass another" of the Stockhouse Disclaimer (found under the Prohibited User Content and Conduct section), I wish there was another angle I could take to get Stockhouse to act. (Note the turn of phrase "intimidate or harass another" is taken verbatim from the policy, btw, showing you the weakness of this policy that looks like no one ever proofread.)
https://stockhouse.com/legal/disclaimer
Regardless, I hear you and I will take your advice under consideration when posting, but I won't let it stop me if, like the trolls, I am in fact acting within the acceptable use policy.