RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:War and /or potential wars...NPCexe wrote: The cases you mention are opinions and commentary on the facts of a story. Rachel Maddow went through the same situation as Tucker and Hannity and the courts ruled on first amendment grounds. What I'm talking about is facts, not how Fox comments on those facts. Leftist media lies about facts, like when they said Kyle Rittenhouse shot 3 black people when they were all white. There's facts and there's opinions. I expect some freedom with the latter, but not the former
quesea wrote: When Tucker & Hannity do get sued for disinformation they always use the same defense,
"You Literally can't believe the facts Tucker tells you", "So say Fox's lawyers" in court, successfully defending him from slander charges !!
Google it !
kc
The fact of the matter is that in the US, CNN - FOX - MSNBC are all about opinions. They spend about 30 minutes a day out of 24 hours of programming on actual news and most of that 30 minutes is reporting is the weather reports which they try from time to time to politize. The rest of the time is propaganda.
Frankly, the thing that concerns me as a Canadian is that our networks generally reported the news and with minimal bias and when there was bias, they said so in advance and lately I have seen a trend to reporting opinions or half truths and IMO this is not a good thing and will lead to the polarization that we see in the US.