Let’s Try this a different way. Can we agree that any mandates/restrictions should have some kind of justifiable benift to be justified?
Can we agree that if that data exists , the easiest way to end the debate is show it?
can we agree that any mandate that infringes on charter rights has to have the meansureably justifiable benefit outlined in the charter that makes such infringents lawful to actually be lawful.
So let's see the data that the mandates (not the vaccines themselves as we already know they can be effective for many who take it) or ebough already.