RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:GM to build battery material plant in Quebecpatience123 wrote: leademhigh wrote: It's all unfortunate spilt milk, we can debate the 'should have been told' about the 'why' behind the delays until we are blue in the face - wont change anything now. Would you have sold? There have been lots of bumps and changes since the UBR days - I've been here that long as well. You didn't sell on those bumps, so why now, when we are much further down the path? Maybe you would have, who am I to judge, you're right, we dont know you, or anybody on the board for that matter! Aside from those with multiple aliases!! The run-up of last year was an anomaly, and I dont base any of my thinking on that. I will just say this, the QRR Pilot Plant will be online by the end of this month. Late as it may be. I stand to be challenged here, because there are data points to the contrary, but that's my feel. Bringing the QRR Pilot Plant online may or may not move the needle on the share price now, but it is a huge step towards producing something the market is very interested in. Just my take, and everybody's entitled to their opinion. Hopefully y'all hedged with buying in on some good old fashioned commodities over the last several months! Happy trading/investing/holding/selling - whatever! Leademhigh
Actually its not unfortunate spilled milk as you would so loosely put it. It was a matter of material information that was disemminated a year later. You dont agree with that? cause i would consider having to rebuild a whole reactor and samples being contaminated with oxygen from the original reactor material news. And in case you dont know what that is.....
Material news is news that a company releases that might affect the value of its securities or influence investors' decisions. It is any type of news that directly relates to the company's business, and depending on the news, it will move the company's share price up or down. would i have sold???? dam rights i would have!