LOL, now you see exactly why they were in no hurry todisclose assay results ... the best they got was "478 m grading 0.23% CuEq between 345m and 823m within vertical hole AN21-03" Schitt man, the copper grade itself was only 0.13% which was why they had to report it as "copper equivalent" and lump in the Ag and Au, which were equally dismal!! ... Why would they even publish that!?