RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Clearwater blog updated - 2 additional wells Mar 15Hey Red2000 ... I can't be offended so no need to apologize. I didn't respond earlier because I still work and I really don't want to belabor the point so I'll keep it simple. You may or may not be arrogant in actuality ... but your reply to my post (which was not directed to or involving you) came off as arrogant for the simple fact that you implied the mere question of BSW consituted a lack of due diligence on my part and that it is you and your ilk that truly have done work and feel no need to provide any kind of assistance to another person who simply asked a question ... the question meaning they are lazy in your mind I suppose.
BSW doesn't try to speculate on numbers such as what I was requesting ... you know ... the correlation of wells to potential flow and dollar value assignments to those flow parameters.
BSW is a chart and graph guy ... he takes the time to do these types of things and I for one find some value in what he does but I don't hold him to anything and I certainly don't make investment decision based solely on his inputs.
I would find the things I requested as a very valuable look into BSW's viewpoint on the base to blue sky potential of Clearwater wells and done in graph or table form would be superior to the interesting work you put out. Not superior because on accuracy or substance ... just based on format.
So ... for what it's worth ... no heat or dismay on my part ... just here absorbing information I find interesting and then I do my own work to see if it aligns with my outlook ... hence the request of BSW.
Cheers mofo (joke) ... lol. Been around this Stockhouse game a very long time ... nothing gets me on this platform or any other (ie, Yahoo, Ceo.ca and so on)