RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Financials Update:Focus on ChinaGrahamB wrote: "I pay no attention to his either, and if he gets over bearing - as he does quite often - I have the option of the ignore button. Every once in a while he finds something of interest but that is certainly in the minority of his posts. The Babble app won't even work on most of his content where he does some babbling. You each have an agenda. I filter it as I see fit."
Fqir enough Pandora, to each his/her/thier own.
Each of us has an agenda indeed, including you.
We should each also be honest, at least with ourselves.
To me, you "filter" the "overbearing" nature of jopatchglos pumping by ignoring.
My factual posts, that point out the company continues to fail to execute in stated objectives
(sales will be in the upcoming quarter, alliances annnounced) which are supported by reference to published data in contrary elicits a negative post.
Why is that?
Why ignore the promotional post that is unfounded and post negative comments on the factual pot that runs against the board narrative, that is supported only by hope and pushing the story forward?
Why also when the factual posts are a minority, 10% or less, of the promotional posts?
You dont have to answer but think about it, and you will know why I am not deterred by promoters here who malign me for posting factual data.
Good luck
G
Just one last thing -- if you had any compassion for all of the people on this board you might temper your activities and at the same time try not to keep telling us you are the victim here and trying to convince us at the same time that you are only trying to save us fom ourselves. Most of us have been on these boards long enough to recognize that each and every board has at least one of you. And don't feel bad if I didn't include jopatcio in the statement but his type is also included.
I don't hold out a lot of hope for that. We'll see how it rolls out. I'll just read or not read, however the spirit moves me. Cheers!