Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Critical Elements Lithium Corp V.CRE

Alternate Symbol(s):  CRECF

Critical Elements Lithium Corporation is a Canada-based lithium exploration company. The Company is engaged in the acquisition, exploration, development and processing of critical minerals mining properties in Canada. Its projects include Rose Lithium-Tantalum, Rose North, Rose South, Arques, Bourier, Dumulon, Duval, Nisk, Lemare, Caumont, and Valiquette. The Rose Lithium-Tantalum property consists of over 473 claims covering a total area of over 24.99 square kilometers (km2). It lies in the northeastern part of Superior Province, within the Eastmain greenstone belt. The Rose North property consists of about 31 claims covering a total area of over 16.14 km2. The Arques Property is composed of one block totaling around 136 claims covering an area of 6,840.93 hectares (ha) over 18 kilometers (kms) in length in a Southwest-Northeast direction. Bourier Property is comprised of over 304 claims with an area of 15,616.47 ha for over 30 kms. Rose South property consists of over 280 claims.


TSXV:CRE - Post by User

Post by Rinny1on May 14, 2022 1:12pm
220 Views
Post# 34684047

These EVs Are Cheaper To Own Than Gas Cars

These EVs Are Cheaper To Own Than Gas Cars

https://insideevs.com/news/585756/electric-cars-cheaper-gas-cars-off-the-lot/?fbclid=IwAR1VHes_aMCZLMwBlTCUisSOQvR_sbRDjcgsrHbVMblrYdCNsWxPHTQrsxc



We've been saying for years EVs are cheaper to own over time, but a new study says the real-world situation is better in many cases.


We continue to tell you day in and day out that even though electric cars have higher upfront costs, you will save money over a gas car in the long run. This is essentially due to savings on fuel costs and maintenance, and it has proven true in most cases. However, a new study suggests that it's actually cheaper to own an electric version of a car than the gas-powered version starting with the first monthly payment.


The study, which was covered by Electrek, was Energy Innovation's analysis of electric vehicle versus gas vehicle costs in every US state. It factors in a car's financing costs (monthly car payment), fuel, maintenance, insurance, and other fees EV, and even includes EV tax credits and incentives (which is a pro and a con, as we'll clarify later). 


Essentially, the study goes beyond the usual 12-month cost of ownership or long-term cost of ownership model. Rather, it breaks down the total monthly costs over a six-year financing term to determine how much it costs per month to own an EV compared to a comparable gas car.

The interesting part of the study is which vehicles were chosen. In almost every case, instead of choosing purpose-built electric cars versus similar gas cars, it chose models that are available with both gas and electric powertrains.

The likely reasoning behind this decision should make sense, it creates a very even comparison. However, just keep in mind that if the study was using EVs like the Tesla Model Y and Kia EV6, or Chevrolet Bolt, the results could differ, and we can't speculate as to how.


We can say that the $7,500 federal EV tax credit makes a big difference here. The results may differ for EVs that are no longer eligible for the credit, and many shoppers are simply unable to take advantage of the credit in the first place. Lastly, there's no guarantee that the tax credit will remain in place going forward.

As you can see, in every comparison aside from the Leaf, and some may argue the Lightning, the competing cars are basically the same car with a different powertrain. That said, the different versions of the vehicles also have different standard feature sets and extras, so they're still not exactly the same. Keep in mind, all the above EVs are eligible for the $7,500 tax credit, and it was factored into the results.


Comparing the costs of these competing gas and electric cars proved that for most of the models in most states, the EV was cheaper on a month-to-month basis. Moreover, all the electric vehicles were found to be cheaper than their gas-powered counterparts in their total cost of ownership. These points are illustrated in the charts below:

 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>