RE:RE:RE:RE:Post-tax NPV (7%) of $709 mlnRandys1 ... it's not being negative. A low discount rate gives a NPV of $700 million and not billions or at least one billion. Quoting in gold equivalent as opposed to copper equivalent is a sneaky switch ... imo.
Now if Raymond James provided a sensitivity chart then a higher discount rate would show a lower NPV ... lower than $700 million ... uggghhh !!!
Capex is $300 million and not a measly $70 million or whatever that number was that Clark was floating around in one of those interviews.
Raymond James came up with this chit from somewhere.
Why is it so different than what Clarks interviews kinda implied for deposit value and Capex?