New Found Gold Corp V.NFG

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Bottom line with Crux

[AlwaysLong683]

JoanWick wrote:

AlwaysLong683 wrote:

Also, I think Bristow is deluding himself if he thinks it will take 8 years for K to start building a mine at Dixie. 
 

Youre right. He never called it garbage, but youre wrong thinking it will be producing before 8 years.


Jet

Read carefully before you send an impulsive reply.

Nonetheless, I think there's a better-than-even chance Dixie will see its first pour before 2030, especially if it's open-pit. Again, bitter Bristow upset he couldn't add GBR to ABX's family of assets in my view.

Re. NFG:

I think Crux raises some good points, and I have commented in the past about my belief that NFG is likely witholding some assays from public release (e.g. issuing entire press releases with only one or two cores worth of data in the entire release), so perhaps they are witholding poor assay results until they get a good or great result to put in the PR headline, then follow with a data dump of numerous other (earlier) cores later on in the release. I'm big on prompt disclosure and transparency - thus I am suspicious re. NFG in this regard. However, they have hit some jackpot holes - you can call them "veiny veiny" if you like, but the metal factors don't lie. A company hits four-digit cores in three different zones in a small portion of the fault running the entire length of their claims package - that's very impressive to me.