RE:RE RE RE : CiaoIf contract conditions such as NDA on pricing or the like is choking sales then maybe some need to be relaxed. This would be disturbing if Doug can't show flexibility.
ramman1 wrote: Absolutely nothing the matter with protecting your technology via the trademark/patent route. Thats just plain good business managing . The amount , and types of GSI tech products , in patened is not known ,by myself , however Dyment would be (right on top of that situation with no worries).--- From info I have gathered, the company takes that one step further in contracts, and is really worried about someone buying a product and a competitor gaining knowledge at the purchasers level .--- For what its worth, bus owners have just explained to me that the stipulations to a contract ,are just more than what many buyers are willing to handle. I am not a bus owner, nor am I a buyer of GSI products ,so any discussions I have had ,are only confined to a bus owner's explanation and view . ------ALL, means absolutely nothing ,IF , contracts roll in . In all due reality ,what one or two bus owners think, means nothing . HOWEVER: The contracts are NOT exactly pouring in , and it does raise the question , as the top line technology /vrs/ contract wins,is leaving a situation that should not be occuring.