Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Replicel Life Sciences Inc V.RP

Alternate Symbol(s):  REPCF

RepliCel Life Sciences Inc. is a Canada-based regenerative medicine company. The Company is focused on developing cell therapies for aesthetic and orthopedic conditions, including aging/sun-damaged skin, pattern baldness, and chronic tendon degeneration. The Company’s cell therapy product pipeline is comprised of RCT-01 for tendon repair, RCS-01 for skin rejuvenation, and RCH-01 for hair restoration. RCH-01 is an autologous cell therapy utilizing dermal sheath cup (DSC) cells isolated from the hair follicle to treat androgenetic alopecia. RCS-01 is an autologous cell therapy utilizing non-bulbar dermal sheath (NBDS) cells, a type of fibroblast cell isolated from the hair follicle to repair and regenerate tissue. RCT-01 provides a source of collagen expressing cells to the site of injury, addressing the underlying cause of tendinosis. It has also developed an injection device, DermaPrecise, which improves the administration of its cell therapy products and certain other injectables.


TSXV:RP - Post by User

Comment by Ingiboyon Aug 31, 2022 1:00pm
68 Views
Post# 34932870

RE:26.08 Shiseido arbitration

RE:26.08 Shiseido arbitration
MetzGER wrote:

 

https://ceo.ca/content/sedar/RP-20220829-MDA-English-574e.pdf

 (26th August 2022)

he Company attempted to engage Shiseido in settlement discussions by written letters, without success. The Company obtained a legal opinion from a lawyer about proceeding with arbitration. Based on that legal advice, the Company consulted with lawyers that specialize in international arbitration and retained a law firm based in Switzerland, called Aceris Law, to represent the Company in the arbitration. The Company and Aceris Law filed a Notice of Arbitration with the International Center for Dispute Resolution (ICDR), which is the arbitral tribunal that has jurisdiction over the Agreement between the Parties. The Company issued a Press Release advising shareholders of this milestone. Shiseido served the Company with its Response to the Notice of Arbitration and the Company’s legal counsel reviewed Shiseido’s Response with the Company. Based on Shiseido’s Response to the Notice of Arbitration, the Company made a strategic and legally necessary step of terminating the Agreement with Shiseido. A Press Release was issued advising shareholders of this milestone.
From January 1, 2022 – August 26, 2022 the Company has taken the following legal actions as part of the arbitration:
The Company’s legal counsel has continued to fulfil the procedural requirements of the ICDR arbitration process, which to-date has included drafting filing the Notice of Claim, vetting and agreeing to the arbitration panel, making procedural applications, drafting and filing the Statement of Claim and witness statements, corresponding with the panel and opposing counsel regarding the procedural calendar for the full arbitration process, etc. The Company is now awaiting the filing of the Statement of Defence by Shiseido’s counsel.
 CW11032545.1
 
-9–
Various parties have expressed interest in securing the rights to RCH-01 for Asia or certain parts of Asia if and when such rights revert back to RepliCel and become available for relicensing. The Company may enter into discussions with some of these parties regarding possible terms and business model of such a potential collaboration.



Very interesting as per this article that Shiseido's lawyers as of Aug. 26th have not filed the Statement of Defence on behalf of Shiseido.  Replicel has filed all the necessary information to the Arbitrator.
The question is why would they wait this long ?  I would think this bodes well for Replicel.  Obviously this is why it has gone 10+ months so far for a decision.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>