RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Pellet ProductionMany Tks Wiston for this advice. I will forward this to RioTinto and Vale and the Qc government and Arcelor Mittal......What about Boeing?....LOL Too bad you dont have access to the internets.. I told you several times...A little knowledge is a dangerous thing...GLTA others!!.
Winston123 wrote: Hey Raphael easy on the cocktails. H2 has an explosive range of 4%-74% in air, Compared to 5%-15% on natural gas. Clearly you've never been around or worked with hydrogen. Endless amounts of policies and procedures involved. It's has to be stored in its liquid form to get any serious volume. They aren't gonna pipe hydrogen 24 hrs a day to multiple burners. Far to dangerous. if hydrogen was to be implemented it would almost certainly be turned into electricity first. As of today the plasma torch is the only reasonable solution at this time to replace fuel burners. I don't care what the report says. H2 burners are not happening. And if by some crazy chance they try it, it'll be shut down after the first poor worker is blown to the moon.