Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Marimaca Copper Corp T.MARI

Alternate Symbol(s):  MARIF

Marimaca Copper Corp. is a Canada-based exploration and development company focused on base metal projects in Chile. The Company’s principal asset is the Marimaca Copper Project, located in the Antofagasta Region of northern Chile. The Marimaca Copper Project is situated at a low altitude in Chile’s Coastal Copper Belt, 25 kilometers (km) east of the port of Mejillones and 45 km north of Antofagasta, Marimaca has access to water and power, road and rail networks supplying sulphuric acid and other consumables, as well as deepwater ports. The Marimaca Copper Project comprises a set of concessions (the 1-23 Claims), properties 100% owned and optioned by the Company, combined with the adjacent La Atomica and Atahualpa claims, over which Marimaca Copper has the right to explore and exploit resources. This area is referred to as the Marimaca District.


TSX:MARI - Post by User

Comment by fundinvestoron Oct 21, 2022 9:40am
199 Views
Post# 35038506

RE:RE:IKN comments on Marimaca Copper Corporation

RE:RE:IKN comments on Marimaca Copper CorporationNo, I don't its shady at all. I think he is jumping at shadows, and has got himself a little confused. Yesterday there was a comment at the bottom of the article that sums up way:

"You are confusing the 2019 MRE with the 2020 PEA which have different input costs. One would expect the 2020 PEA costs (based on quotes and bottom up estimates) to be more representative compared to costs used in an MRE (2019)."

2022 MRE costs are more reflective of the 2020 PEA which superseded the costs used in the 2019 MRE.


He has ended up comparing apples with oranges himself. The figures he is using for his base-case (2019 MRE) are out of date and nolonger relevent, as the PEA 2020 (which was fully costed with industry quotes) provided updated and much more reliable figures.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>