RE:Enrique and Eoghan : help please The 1st chart is CR at any time point 23 patients reached CR at 90 days, and 3 got CR at later time points, hence the difference vs 2nd chart is 23 at 90 days ( doesn't include those from later time points. ) Safety has been met with flying colours too 100%. Looks great and improving exactly as expected. Seems to be very predictable so far as we see in latest 5 newly evaluable patients where 4 out of 5 are CR with 1 single treatment and 1 seems to be potentialy PR. That is 80% CR on those 5 after 1 single treatment on patients who failed standard of care and would have required Bladder removal. Cancer free and keep your bladder. Seems Damn good IMHO
N0taP00p wrote: The note under table 1 says "CR was achieved as follows: 23 patients at 90 days, 1 patient at 180 days and 2 patients at 270 days." This is for primary objective. How does this align with the Table 2 CR numbers for the 90, 180 and 270 columns?
Second, looks like the safety objective is met 100% this time. No additional eval needed. Right?
Third, they have more than the needed 25 at 450 days and it's already better than keytruda. Can you please give them your permission to submit?
Last, any idea how much money they have left in the tank? Thanks for your inputs as always!