RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Red Flags to Considercan't make sense out of your word salad.
i'm not implying anything about AN's physical property. please provide something concrete which supports your position that a buyer of oncy could just walk away from the oncy/AN agreement.
i've provided actual language from the agreement which clearly states that oncy has the rights to pela in the "rest of the world". the "rest of the world" is defined in the agreement as anyplace other than china, singapore, macau, taiwan, hong kong and south korea. it's those six areas which i've said make up close to 20% of the world population (read market for pela and what ever combos might be clinically tried, applied for and approved in those markets).
you are very good about providing context about other things you post, not so much regarding this issue. again, can you cite any language from the agreement which supports your position?
let's keep things real. contract language is difficult at best but is written to cover things which are far from boilerplate provisions. the meat of a contract/agreement is found in those words which are outside of the boilerplate.