Somebody please help me out hereAm I missing the logic behind Pinkies` mission here. Apparently, Pinkie bought a lot of YFI stock at one time, sold most of it at an admitted great loss, and feels he was played for a fool. Whether he was or not, I have no idea. However, this is what I fail to understand. Nobody but Pinkie was even aware of this, however Pinkie decides to achieve retribution by informing hundreds of strangers, including myself his story but doesn`t want us to think he is a fool. If that makes sense, tell me what I am missing.
Secondly, if I was to attack, or question the operational conduct of a CEO or of any other member of management, would it not be expected of me to specifically point out what was wrong and then convince you why my solution would have been better.. In other words, if you have the jam to criticize, you should be man enough to convince everyone that you could have performed that task better. Now before answering whether this self proclaimed better CEO we now know as Pinkie is the better man, reread the first paragraph.