RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Who remembers brad129 wrote:
Jonnyboy85 wrote: This is money for shares, plus interest, purchasing 10% control position. Tell what what insider would approve taking on a position that enormous and gem getting 25% if there was even the most remote possibility they were going to sell the share price down into nothing? If insiders trust gem and they're holding 10%+ shares, I think I can trust them with my share lot lol but please continue distorting good news darling, the share price and volume direction does not agree with you, but then again, that's why you're here all day working hard aren't you?
Funny that money was lent to them to keep them afloat, better to get some shares then let the company go belly up? Pretty ironic you keep saying not to bring up the past performance when that's exactly what you are doing here, comprehend this that was money from the past not purchasing 10% today.
insider gives money, insider gets shares in excess of 10% outstanding, I don't care if it's new money or old, it's an insider taking an enormous position, which is an enormous vote of confidence and coupled with an institutional investor wanting to do the same and more, it shows there is confidence in the company and share price and gem. Which is the opposite of what you want obviously by how hard your working to distort the news. The company also has to disclose all material information publicly before issuing those shares too, and before our vote on the subject lol that's why you're putting in all this time to get your bids filled before it happens