RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Coronation Just to make GrahamB FUD argument (that past warrants future) is simply ... a FUD.
Take a look at this example.
End of year Market Cap
| Year | Market cap | Change |
| 2023 | $5.12 B | 78.39% |
| 2022 | $2.87 B | 48.93% |
| 2021 | $1.92 B | 209.51% |
| 2020 | $0.62 B | 46.25% |
| 2019 | $0.42 B | 757.14% |
| 2018 | $0.49 B | -55.82% |
| 2017 | $0.11 B | -34.79% |
| 2016 | $0.17 B | -93.76% |
| 2015 | $2.76 B | 81.21% |
| 2014 | $1.52 B | 50.1% |
| 2013 | $1.01 B
|
Innovative stocks, that don't have established growth can see their share price rollercoaster as they depend on events, contracts, breakthroughs. GrahamB knows this but subtly plays FUD by saying "no sales", "no revenues". PYR has identified last month 3 ways it can use while waiting for these contracts.
By the way, PYR has a tiny debt. So GrahamB's creditors argument doesn't really apply here. And we all know about the "revenue" issue of PYR as we all read the news releases. But strange that GrahamB silences long awaited upcoming contracs, mainly SAT by VALE and Rio Tinto and final 3D-printing powder certification with a major N-A aerospace manufacturer.
_______________
GrahamB - (5/8/2023 12:16:50 PM)
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Coronation
Different board, but all bite.
New CEO-new story
Same results.
Sales are non-existent-stock down 78% from past few years, over 90% from peak for a reason.