RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Coronation GrahamB ... You're not impressing anybody with your definitions. You should though understand to who they apply.
Your behavior is one of a guy that plays FUD by living in the past and ignoring the future. Your "model" is simply focused on the past.
We're all aware of the financials as they've been published. And we all know that revenues are needed. And that TMX-V stocks are more risky than bonds. After all, it's all our decision to have invested in innovative stocks.
No need to play the savvior as you're not even able to tell us what's coming up in terms of contracts.