Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Nickel 28 Capital Corp V.NKL

Alternate Symbol(s):  CONXF

Nickel 28 Capital Corp. is a Canada-based nickel-cobalt producer through its 8.56% joint-venture interest in the Ramu Nickel-Cobalt Operation located in Papua New Guinea. In addition, the Company manages a portfolio of nickel and cobalt royalties on projects in Canada, Australia and Papua New Guinea, including a 1.75% net smelter return (NSR) royalty in the Dumont nickel project in Quebec and a 2.0% NSR royalty on the Turnagain nickel project in British Columbia. The Company is focused on building its portfolio of battery metals investments, including streams, royalties and other direct interests in producing mines, development projects or exploration properties. The Company's royalties include Dumont Nickel-Cobalt Royalty, Turnagain Nickel-Cobalt Royalty, Flemington Cobalt-Scandium-Nickel Royalty and Nyngan Cobalt-Scandium-Nickel Royalty.


TSXV:NKL - Post by User

Comment by ICNickon Jun 06, 2023 8:24pm
116 Views
Post# 35483502

RE:New Press Release - Pelham Investment Partners LP Confirms Recommendation to Vote WITHHOLD on Board of Directors of Nickel 28 Capital Corp on YELLOW Proxy

RE:New Press Release - Pelham Investment Partners LP Confirms Recommendation to Vote WITHHOLD on Board of Directors of Nickel 28 Capital Corp on YELLOW ProxyThis is getting merky. I am far from being an expert on voting majority for each director and what happens if there are more "witheld" than votes for. I found a good article on Stikeman's website that provides an explanation of the rules. For those interested: https://www.stikeman.com/en-ca/kh/canadian-securities-law/statutory-majority-voting-requirements-to-come-into-force-for-cbca-incorporated-reporting-issuers

I
 guess, the board could refuse a director's resignation under "special circumstances", however that director cannot be part of the vote to accept or refuse a resignation.
What happens if all directors have to resigne? Then there is nobody to vote and maybe this is the case Pelham is trying to make here. Not clear.

Pelham however makes a good point that many things have or are changing since they started getting involved. Does it mean it would have been status quo otherwise? Most likely yes. Vote yellow proxy smartly folks!

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>