RE:RE:Nickel 28's Majority Voting PolicyMy 2 cents. If the board of directors act ethically and uphold their duty they will either step down or call a special meeting to reconstitute the board with the input of Pelham and shareholders. If they do the right thing here I can see them keeping some board seats. Given this board has not acted ethically in the past it’s doubtful or 50/50 at best. With that said they have no viable end game and the writing is on the wall; they can buy a year but they will all be removed at the next annual meeting and have no seat at the table going forward. On the Pelham front they can try to call as special meeting. I don’t know all the rules in Canada but there is generally a pathway to do so. Lastly, I think Pelham has multipole litigation options to bring them to the table. The best outcome is for N28 and Pelham is to come to the table and negotiate a more balanced board and address compensation and governance issues moving forward.