Leo`s idea of being cute by the way he dancesI never questioned anyone's integrity or professionalism. I said the POC was a ridiculous way to determine if wifi3 was better. I still stand by my issue which was the wifi3 data was never actually tested live. It was just numbers pulled from some other random test
Readers here can answer for themselves whether Leo questioned directly, by implication, or by innuendo anyones integrity or professionalism including any company who participated in the POC including their employees.
And what specific role did read that wifi3 played in this POC? I saw no published wifi3 data. And what specifically is the random test he is referring to? For a professional to discount its validity is it not reasonable to expect him to back up such an obtuse statement by being more specific? Which brings up another reason why many trust Leo less than someone hawking time shares. When was the last time you heard Leo question the veracity behind the performance claims incumbents in the industry put on the boxes of their products? Has Leo ever demanded real world testing of these products? No, it is more than apparent that our own little Leo is more than content to be satisfied with testing soley in Faraday chambers. Yes, and it is the same insecure little Leo who thought it was in our interest to know of his famous parties, thousand dollar wine by the case, what he thought were the going trend in designer clothes and shoes, big time spots gambler and casino player that always beats the house, etc; etc.
You know, that one of a kind idiot you can spot in any crowd from 100 meters wrapped all in counterfeit. lol