RE:Freshwater makeupThere is 0 doubt in my mind this is working and will successfully be fully proven. Like i am constantly affiming it is all now about strategically heating to get even more oil flow from the base level. I am having a bit of a tough time trying to convey what i am. Let me try to give a hypothetical which is for illustrative purposes only not necessarily a factual one. Lets say in terms of a car engine. Lets say every time someone turns the car on and off it takes more energy than keeping it on however leaving it on burns more gas and has more wear and tear relative to being more used but less wear and tear relative to how much it takes on the car from going off to on. Now given we talk about having the car go from off to on vs leaving the engine running lets say that when people wait in line for lets say a border line they can either turn the engine off or leave it running (no doubt people decide in terms of fuel being consumed) but this is akin to the heating cycle in what will give you the optimum oil flow and what intensity and for how long as well as how much overall wear and tear comes. It isnt the issue of whether there is oil flow we know that for 6 months it is flowing and is beneficial without the need for solvents etc so we can safely assume none will be needed. Now assuming the on off or leave heat on for whatever intensity and duration has x amount of damage on the equipment it is about finding the optimal oil flow with the lesser amount of damage to the equipment as is the case about the car.There is no difference. The car runs it works that isnt the question the question is the wear and tear from off to on relative to the car contininuing to run etc. This is why i have already said the tech works if it didnt the process would have ended and the company would be forced to close things down. The process clearly works the whole testing cycle is to fine tune everything and see what the finding shows. Right off the bat this is a far improvement on the conventional as there has been and i dont see any need for the use of water this in itself is huge. The fact that this heavily cuts co2 is what makes all this very important and why Mike talked about carbon capture and not necessarily needing it with this tech although the more greening the better.
Having said this as this is only my opinion as a lay person lets see what the testing continues to and fully shows. So far so good the company remains confident with the data at hand so thats great. Time will tell all things.