Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Cardinal Energy Ltd (Alberta) T.CJ

Alternate Symbol(s):  CRLFF

Cardinal Energy Ltd. is a Canadian oil and natural gas company with operations focused on low decline oil in Western Canada. The Company is engaged in the acquisition, development, optimization and production of crude oil and natural gas in the provinces of Alberta, British Columbia and Saskatchewan. Its operating areas include the Midale, South District, Central District, and North District. Its Midale operating area of over 730 million barrels of original oil in place (OOIP) and its low decline in production of 3,200 barrels of oil equivalent per day (boe/d) (net) is supported by both waterflood and CO2 enhanced oil recovery. Its South District operating area is located east of Calgary in southeastern Alberta and produces medium gravity crude, as well as liquids-rich natural gas. Its Central District operation is located in East Central Alberta, which is focused on producing oil from multiple, large OOIP pools. Its North area includes Grande Prairie, Clearwater and other properties.


TSX:CJ - Post by User

Comment by JayBankson Nov 07, 2023 12:16pm
215 Views
Post# 35721692

RE:RE:2024 budget and SAGD impact

RE:RE:2024 budget and SAGD impact

Quintessential1 wrote: While CIBC Capital Markets agrees with your budgetary calculations:

"  2024 budget adds spending to construct SAGD facility. Conventional spending of $116MM is higher than our estimate at $100MM and Street at $111MM, while SAGD facility construction is expected to add $68.5MM in 2024. Production of 22.3 MBoe/d is in line with our estimate of 22.3 MBoe/d and ahead of Street at 21.2 MBoe/d."

They differ in their debt projections however and I can't see why:

"Price Target Calculation
Our 12- to 18-month price target of $9.00 is based on a target 2024E EV/DACF multiple of
5.4x on our CIBC base commodity price forecasts. We estimate net debt of $7MM in 2024E. "

That $7MM estimate in net debt at the end of 2024 suggests that they think CJ can pay down $11MM per quarter until YE2024.  The next ER should be telling on whether they are even close in that estimation.

GLTA



mickeymouse wrote: Looking at the 2024 budget and their new Redford SAGD project from the presentation:

2024 FFO = 290
Conventional Capex = 116
Thermal Project Capex = 68
ARO = 20
Dividend = 116
 
Debt will increase slightly next year - about 30 million.

 Spend in 2025 on this project  is projected to be 88 million but incremental cash flow of 28 million is projected for 2025 so net incremental capex in that year would be 60 million and the increase in net debt will be about 22 million.

 So debt should peak at about 100 million in late 2025 but starting in 2026 there will be postive cash flow from this project - estimate for 2026 is about 105 million.  So in summary a small increase in debt for the next two years followed by higher cash flow starting in 2026 if everything goes as planned and current oil prices/differential/FX rates etc. stay relatively static - a lot of ifs but the payout could be significant going forward.

 

t






 




 

11M/Q is quite doable considering they just knocked off 14M and that was before they bought more production. The said they expect to payoff the new purchase by the end of Q4 with FCF, with the little dip in price I don't know that we will see that projection hit.

I think some of the debt numbers and projections don't account for the new purchase because most of this stuff is from Q3 after which the deal was made... maybe some stuff is conflicting in oversights due to that...

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>