RE:Why there is no investment money in Junior mining Directvoice,
That is a decent article simplistically summarizing some of what most well experienced equities investors (i.e. in some cases, very badly burned equities investors) and also many pure hit and run and very short term speculators did without a doubt know then and certainly know now.
"Appian’s investors have their money locked in for 10 to 12 years. At Appian, the goal isn’t to predict whether a commodity price will remain high in three years’ time, the way a hedge fund might, but rather to decipher which mining assets will thrive even when metals prices suffer".
The immediately aforestated point made by the author, Tim Kiladze, is all well and good, i.e. if you are writing a article trying to convince would-be sheep to behave while potentailly none the less being led to the slaughter . . .
Suffice to say who in the - see flock of seagulls - is this Tim Kiladaze trying to fool?
This Appian Capital Advisory LLP is a private investor firm being operated by and on behalf of former mining executives and "bankers".
Appian Capital Advisory LLP administrators and executives manage US$3.6-billion in assets and take up both senior secured and convertible debt stakeholds and common shares equity stakeholdds in mining projects developing and promoting companies, doing so in what they claim is for a very longer term hold.
Keep in mind that Appian Capital Advisory LLP administrators likely go about doing so whilst having their selected privately operating intermediaries and the multitudes of employed minions operating on behalf of such privately operating and "highly interested parties" incessantly facilitating and thereby generating immense ROI from selling short the very equities issued by the very companies (want to be ctitical elements miners and base metal miners) Appain Capital Advisory LLP maintains a longer term investment with.
It's nothing new really. Appian Capital Advisory LLP administrators and executives manage to play it long with little relative risks; whilst also playing their investments short when the very market cycle being experienced currently does invariably present.
That's correct. "Privately pledging" tranches of long term hold kinds of common equities taken up in said types of lands development and some day mine development and and actual mining companies to private parties; doing so in order to have beaten down and sold short the very companies they "long term" invest in.
That is what the outfits operated by and on behalf of "former mining executives and former bankers", like those persons with Appian Capital Advisory LLP, won't be telling you they all routinely go about doing.
The days of cheaply attained capital and therefore fast, very loose and readily available capital acquisition benefiting certain companies are gone.
Here's to hoping that Mason Resources Inc stakeholders are able to successfully pursue their now expanded plans.
After all, Mr, Kiladze, the author of the article in question, is certainly correct about one particular aspect. Clearly the very quality of asset which Mason Resource Inc does still own, Lac Gueret, is the kind of asset which would generate great revenue both during good times and during cyclical downtrends as well, i.e. provided a company kind of like GM involves itself with the comprehensive supporting of the expedited development of the Lac Gueret graphite project into becoming a full fledged mine in it's own right.