Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd T.NDM

Alternate Symbol(s):  NAK

Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. is a Canada-based mineral exploration and development company based in Vancouver. The Company’s principal business activity is the exploration of mineral properties. The Company’s principal asset, owned through its wholly owned subsidiary, Pebble Limited Partnership, is a 100% interest in a contiguous block of about 1,840 mineral claims in Southwest Alaska, including the Pebble deposit, located about 200 miles from Anchorage and 125 miles from Bristol Bay. The Pebble Partnership is the proponent of the Pebble Project. The deposit lies entirely within the Lake and Peninsula Borough, approximately 23,782 square miles of land. The deposit is a Copper-Gold-Molybdenum-Silver-Rhenium project. Its subsidiaries include 3537137 Canada Inc., Northern Dynasty Partnership, U5 Resources Inc., Pebble West Claims Corporation, and others.


TSX:NDM - Post by User

Comment by RealityCheck123on Nov 29, 2023 11:26am
67 Views
Post# 35758661

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:SCOTUS rejects AK’s motion?

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:SCOTUS rejects AK’s motion?

Go Granny go, but Granny don't know.

Incorrect.

They have never been stopped from permitting. A new Operating/Mine Plan (POO) can be submitted to the USACE at any time based from the new PRELIMINARY ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT (PEA).  They could also submit all their Local and State permit applications.  Point being your statement in context of regulatory permitting is inadequate.

Are you aware under NEPA the USACE is required to prepare the EIS without proponent funding?  Maybe if they knew what they where doing that strategy may have been advantageous.  How many years now?

Underground only or nothing, if economic.

Ok TeleTubbyTuTom?



 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>