RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RDW on youtube posted todayMikee3003 wrote: No that was not a mistake, he said 2026 and he meant it!
Once again correct if wrong, thank you. When Roger said 2026 was that to treat the patient population over & above the 30 to 40 percent of unresponsive NMIBC?
Ok what I'm saying here is if they get AA & BTD then can they not immediately treat the unresponsive population and after PH2 is completed and have reached 15 or 18 months on all patients, Theralase should be able to demonstrate higher efficacy, durability and with less AE's and less treatments. This would take them into 2026 which would be the point Roger spoke of and would be the balance or 60 to 70 percent remaining of NMIBC cases.
Remember a CEO can't assume AA or BTD so when any CEO discusses future possibilities they must look at point of completion without early approval.
All in my opinion and please correct or criticize, thanks.