Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Marathon Gold Corp T.MOZ

Marathon Gold Corporation is a Canada-based gold exploration and development company. The Company’s primary business focus is the exploration and development of its flagship asset, the wholly owned Valentine Gold Project, located in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. The project comprises a series of five mineralized deposits along a 32- kilometer system. Its prospects are located along the Valentine Lake Shear Zone and include Frank Zone, Rainbow Zone, Triangle Zone, Victoria Bridge, Narrows, Victory Southwest, Victory Northeast, and the Berry Zone. In addition to the Valentine Gold Project in the Central Region of Newfoundland and Labrador, the Company holds 100% interests in the Bonanza Mine, a former mine located in Baker County in northeastern Oregon, the Gold Reef property, an exploration property consisting of approximately 12 hectares of claims located near Stewart, British Columbia; and a 2% net smelter returns royalty on precious metal sales by the Golden Chest mine in Idaho.


TSX:MOZ - Post by User

Comment by theCurseon Dec 08, 2023 12:20am
138 Views
Post# 35774348

RE:RE:RE:seeking alpha report

RE:RE:RE:seeking alpha report
"How is it MOZ shareholders can be losers when they become shareholders in Calibre that is a successful profitable operation and still have an interest in Valentine Lake."

Because the 0.6164 ratio and the PP at 60 cents.  The offer was terrible. It should have been closer to a 1:1 because of it de-risked CXB and "risked" MOZ shareholders how had previously had little risk.

That's how.  And i mean you must comprehend what was written in that article.  don't come here making it sound all rosy for MOZ shareholders.

The MOZ management had not skin in the game - only severance packages.  Not sure how the larger shareholders were convinced - perhaps they were fed up and looking for competent management.

tC
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>