VMNGFJack Sprat - yes, I am sure many others would like to see Garland's comments as well, myself included.
Further to John Kaiser's report - one thing we have to consider which John mentioned is
that IMG could possibly demand VSR's participation in any further drilling in the Nelligan area - something I guess we as shareholders were not aware of as we are not privy to the agreement between IMG and Vanstar, but obviously John got this information from VSR management.
Our 2 million in the bank would soon be gone, and IMG may not demand this but now we know there is a possibility of this happening. This would not bode well for the shareholders.
I still question VSR's management decisions - why did we drill Bousquet with VSR money just to hand it back to IMG and receive llittle or no value for Bousquet? I strongly question why the royalty was not treated separately into another entity?
I was planning on voting No, but now I question that decision because of John's comments. I do lend weight to John Kaiser's review of the overall situation.