RE:RE:RE:RE:Chances Agree and forgetting for a moment we shareholders, there are many good reasons for Duparquet and Springpole to be successful projects for their respective provinces and constituents. The Duparquet site in its current state poses serious environmental risks to the local residents and wildlife. It needs to be remediated and given that such cleanup (which would be expensive for the province to fund separately) is baked into First Mining's plans is good on many levels. Springpole is more about benefiting the local economy in that area. In my view Duparquet in particular needs to be successful because it's current state is unsustainable. The province will have to pay to clean it up if a company such as First Mining doesn't remediated it as part of building/upgrading the mining capabilities at the site. Springpole should also move forward if the residents of Red Lake see the value in what such a project will bring to their area for many years (better infrastructure, local business growth, education, jobs). The waiting is the hardest part (seems like we are driving towards 2030) but it seems that First Mining continues to focus on the right moves at the right time within the limits of their available resources and funding. GLTA