RE:How can Nano compete with this? The Springpower acquisition seems to make a lot of sense according to the news article below. Does anyone have a link to these Springpower/Tesla patents for MCAM so we can compare them to the Nano One patents?
https://techcrunch.com/2021/05/04/tesla-taps-tiny-startups-tech-to-build-cheaper-cleaner-batteries/amp/
Tesla has a long history of aqui-hiring (hiring via acquisition to gain a company's core people/expertise). And it looks like all the key Springpower staff now work for Tesla.
Doesn't it make the most sense that Tesla is in fact using a MCAM patent that they purchased in the Springpower acquisition to make their own MCAM in an environmentally sustainable way?
Occam's Razor - "The simplest explanation is usually the best one." Ironic that "Occam" has the word "CAM" within it.
Surely there is 50:50 odds (or greater?) that the news story below is true? And if so, wouldn't that be devistational for Nano One investors if Tesla has a comparable/competitive patented MCAM process to the Nano One Pot process? Couldn't Tesla potentially scale up much faster than Nano and simply license their own Tesla MCAM tech to all the North American EV and ESS players?
The evidence in the news release below about the Springpower acquisition and the fact that former Sprinpower staff are now working for Tesla seems to be somewhat damning. Is this considered a major risk for Nano One shareholders?
https://techcrunch.com/2021/05/04/tesla-taps-tiny-startups-tech-to-build-cheaper-cleaner-batteries/amp/
Does anyone have a link to these Springpower/Tesla patents for MCAM so we can compare them to the Nano One patents?