RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Vivekwintersun10 wrote: For bagholders Poet went from $15 to $1.50.
Them are the facts.
Trading is frowned upon on the Bull Boards.
So, the 90% haircut stands forever for the bagholders. gilver wrote: Stop staying stuck in the past. If you were stuck with a WW2 mindset, you would still think the current progress in the world is bad when in fact a lot of good has become of this world since then --- but at the same time, the world is never perfect. Stuck in the past mentality eventually fails completely. If you go back about 3 months would Poet's share price was more than double where it is now. Poet will continue to recover because it still has a future as to where it has positioned itself in the market. if you are a true and believing shareholder, you would understand that. However, if you are a trader, then it never matters what you think of Poet.
gilver
Trading is not frowned upon--- afterall, it is the stock market!!!
It does not matter if Poet was $20 pre-split or in a recovery price as it is now. The same familiar posters cluster post and repeatedly post the same negativity seemingly regardless of what Poet does or does not do according to them. That is a "red flag" for unnatural behavior and attitude about the stock they bash. Readers don't need to repeatedly here the same kinds of posts about how bad a stock is to them. Wouldn't it be more natural for them to sell and move on to something else that makes them happy about a stock they own?
Obviously, the negative contingent here seems more inclined in favor to post negativity seemingly to create more fear and doubt around their trading, why? Why else would people stay around for years reposting old themes over and over again daily and while at the same time saying they are trading? Couldn't trading be done without gaslighting what is seemingly excessive and exaggerated negativity? Sometimes negativity is justified, But all the time? Ha.
gilver